|
|
Post by karenee on Jun 7, 2005 19:25:05 GMT -5
agree only under certain circumstances, such as abuse...and then, not as a way to seek other relationships, but to improve the current one.
Going through grave hardship is the best way to become a better person.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dred on Jun 8, 2005 7:17:52 GMT -5
I don't agree entirely. I don't think a person has to go through grave hardships to become a better person. I think you can face trials and tribulation and become a better person as a result of them.
same question.
|
|
|
|
Post by DanTheMan on Jun 8, 2005 16:06:16 GMT -5
Agree. Separation for a time would be better than divorce.
A watched pot never boils.
|
|
|
|
Post by karenee on Jun 8, 2005 17:50:24 GMT -5
disagree - it does, eventually
forgivness is for your own sake, if not for the sake of others.
|
|
|
|
Post by dgan on Jun 9, 2005 2:03:49 GMT -5
Agree - why else forgive those who no longer benefit from your forgiveness?
Exercise is more important than diet.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dred on Jun 9, 2005 7:51:12 GMT -5
While I think it best to have a very good balance of the two, I believe exercise to be slightly more important.
same question.
|
|
|
|
Post by cree8ivone on Jun 9, 2005 8:32:54 GMT -5
Exercise is a little more important, but like Dred said 'Balance'.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dred on Jun 9, 2005 8:48:59 GMT -5
Agree completely. There is external beauty and internal beauty. Each person sees something different depending on what they are looking for.
same question. (good one)
|
|
|
|
Post by karenee on Jun 9, 2005 10:38:02 GMT -5
agree - even the most incredible physical beauty is easily marred by pride and foolishness and any of us can attract love with interior beauty until loved ones would scorn any thought of ugliness.
same question
|
|
|
|
Post by dgan on Jun 9, 2005 10:43:44 GMT -5
Agree. Beauty, by definition, is an observation, not a quality. Therefore, I don't see how it could be any other way.
What goes up must come down.
|
|
|
|
Post by karenee on Jun 9, 2005 10:49:15 GMT -5
disagree? well, theoretically, at least. With most things, that's the rule and I'd have to agree.
The only real relationship is one where you actually meet face to face.
(Waits for the uproar. LOL)
|
|
|
|
Post by DanTheMan on Jun 9, 2005 12:19:42 GMT -5
Disagree - I have a relationship with God but never met him face to face. And it definitely real.
same
|
|
|
|
Post by kahne9 on Jun 9, 2005 12:20:57 GMT -5
Disagree - You can have friendships even though you have never met face to face. Lots of people have friendships online. Sometimes those friendships you have online are better than friendships with people you see on a daily basis.
Same question.
|
|
|
|
Post by dgan on Jun 10, 2005 2:04:49 GMT -5
Disagree - it is the status of relations between two "bodies". Distance has nothing to do with it.
Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers...
|
|
|
|
Post by karenee on Jun 10, 2005 2:08:11 GMT -5
agree- or at least someone did once... Staying up all night has some benefits.  |
|
